I would never call myself a "gamer." We don't own an XboX and, although I did become insanely addicted to "Pocket Frogs" for iPad while recovering from surgery, I tend to consider such things a dangerous pastime that can lead to, well, addiction.
To my intense ambivalence, I was utterly dismayed and delighted to see this post over at The Duchess of Devonshire's Gossip Guide to the 18th Century. I'll be damned if Assassin's Creed isn't coming out with not only a scenario set in Old New Orleans but one featuring a ball-smashing, octoroon, lady assassin. Well, shit. (As an aside, that paragraph probably contains more blue language than the whole sum of every other post here at Triple P. I'll just go ahead and apologize right now: sorry).
Anyway, here's the gist of Assassin's Creed 3: Liberation:
The year is 1765. As the events leading up to the American Revolution heat up in the north, Spanish forces plan to take control of Louisiana in the south - but they have yet to reckon with Aveline, a deadly Assassin who will use every weapon and ability in her arsenal to win freedom for her land and her people.
Sweet beignets! That kicks all kinds of ass on paper! But watching the reveal trailer will really get you pumped. Also, if you're like me, you might be curious about the weapons wielded by Aveline de Granpre. Thankfully, AC has given us a trailer for that too. My personal favorite may surprise the Brethren. Pistols are nice and all, but you never need to reload a machete and the blood splatter stays further away from you than it does with hidden blades.
Anyway, suffice it to say that I would happily welcome Mademoiselle de Granpre aboard my ship as a mate at any time. She'd need to learn the ropes, of course, but she'd be a decided asset in close quarters right off the belaying pin.
Header: Assassin Aveline de Granpre via the Ubisoft website. AC3 will be available in October
Friday, August 31, 2012
Thursday, August 30, 2012
Ships: Old Ironsides vs. Warrior
On August 30, 1812, Captain Isaac Hull brought his now famous frigate, USS Constitution, into the port of Boston with what was then astonishing news. Constitution had quite literally destroyed the British frigate of 38 guns HMS Guerriere in a firefight at sea.
The news was particularly well received in Boston, always a port town full of sailors, where the United States' battle cry of the two-month-old War of 1812 was well known: Free Trade and Sailors Rights. Guerriere had been a particular thorn in the side of U.S. merchantmen. Her captain, James Richard Dacres, was notorious for stopping such vessels, searching them and almost invariable finding men he labelled British deserters. Whether the charge was true or not, these men were immediately impressed for service aboard Guerriere.
The battle between the two ships, which began on August 19th some time after 2:00 PM, saw two fighting captains with well-prepared crews coming together in what seemed, on its face, to be a fairly even exchange. The Americans, whose navy was still in its youth at the time, nonetheless trusted their sturdy frigates built of nearly impregnable white oak. They also relied on their crews' unusual mixture of self-discipline and honest enthusiasm. Meanwhile, the Royal Navy ruled the waves, and did not blink at taking on a similar sized ship from any navy in the world, regardless of firepower.
The inequalities of the two ships, however, would lead to the unfortunate result that the Royal Navy had no doubt secretly dreaded from the beginning of the war. As the records of Captain Dacres' court martial indicate, Guerriere was old and desperately in need of a refit when she met Constitution on her way to the port of Halifax in the British colony of Nova Scotia. Her timbers, and in particular her masts, were literally rotten when all three in rapid succession were torn away by Constitution's guns. Then too, as Dacres would point out, she was a French prize and therefor not built to British standards.
On the other hand, Constitution carried 44 guns in answer to Guerriere's 38. Her crew was itching for a fight as many of them had friends and relatives who had been impressed by the Royal Navy; some had even suffered that ignominy themselves. Her captain was capable and level headed and made only one slip toward the end of the battle, missing stays and entangling Guerrier's bowsprit in Constitution's aft rigging. The most remarkable advantage Constitution had, however, was her tough hull. It was, according to legend, during this battle that she earned her nickname. When a shot from Guerrier bounced off Constitution's side, the Royal Navy gun crews began the rumor that she had "sides of iron."
Though Dacres never raised a white flag of surrender, Hull surmised when Guerrier was done and sent his First Lieutenant across in a boat to address the British captain. When asked if he would care to surrender, Dacres famously replied: "Our mizzen mast is gone, and our fore and main gone as well. I think, sir, that on the whole one might evince that we have struck our flag." And to this day the British are better at sarcasm than we Americans.
Dacres was welcomed aboard Constitution with all civility. Hull refused Dacres' sword as well. He would say later that he was particularly glad of it when the news came to him that Dacres had allowed 12 impressed American sailors to wait out the battle in Guerrier's hold, rather than have to fight against their countrymen. Though Hull had hoped to tow Guerrier to Boston as prize, the damage to her was to great. When it was clear that she would sink, Hull had all her stores and people removed to Constitution and then set her aflame.
Though a few later encounters - particularly the battle between USS Chesapeake and HMS Shannon - would not go so well for the Americans, this first decisive victory renewed the American hope for a swift and successful end to the war. It also began, even at this early stage, the British shift from a focus on war at sea - where the Royal Navy was flabbergasted at being regularly defeated - to a war on land. Unfortunately, despite the burning of Washington D.C. which remains the flagship victory of Britain and her colonies in the War of 1812, that didn't turn out so well either.
But the Battle of New Orleans is another discussion for another time. For today, Huzzah! Old Ironsides, her crew and Captain Isaac Hull.
Header: USS Constitution vs HMS Guerriere by Michel Felice Corne via Wikipedia
The news was particularly well received in Boston, always a port town full of sailors, where the United States' battle cry of the two-month-old War of 1812 was well known: Free Trade and Sailors Rights. Guerriere had been a particular thorn in the side of U.S. merchantmen. Her captain, James Richard Dacres, was notorious for stopping such vessels, searching them and almost invariable finding men he labelled British deserters. Whether the charge was true or not, these men were immediately impressed for service aboard Guerriere.
The battle between the two ships, which began on August 19th some time after 2:00 PM, saw two fighting captains with well-prepared crews coming together in what seemed, on its face, to be a fairly even exchange. The Americans, whose navy was still in its youth at the time, nonetheless trusted their sturdy frigates built of nearly impregnable white oak. They also relied on their crews' unusual mixture of self-discipline and honest enthusiasm. Meanwhile, the Royal Navy ruled the waves, and did not blink at taking on a similar sized ship from any navy in the world, regardless of firepower.
The inequalities of the two ships, however, would lead to the unfortunate result that the Royal Navy had no doubt secretly dreaded from the beginning of the war. As the records of Captain Dacres' court martial indicate, Guerriere was old and desperately in need of a refit when she met Constitution on her way to the port of Halifax in the British colony of Nova Scotia. Her timbers, and in particular her masts, were literally rotten when all three in rapid succession were torn away by Constitution's guns. Then too, as Dacres would point out, she was a French prize and therefor not built to British standards.
On the other hand, Constitution carried 44 guns in answer to Guerriere's 38. Her crew was itching for a fight as many of them had friends and relatives who had been impressed by the Royal Navy; some had even suffered that ignominy themselves. Her captain was capable and level headed and made only one slip toward the end of the battle, missing stays and entangling Guerrier's bowsprit in Constitution's aft rigging. The most remarkable advantage Constitution had, however, was her tough hull. It was, according to legend, during this battle that she earned her nickname. When a shot from Guerrier bounced off Constitution's side, the Royal Navy gun crews began the rumor that she had "sides of iron."
Though Dacres never raised a white flag of surrender, Hull surmised when Guerrier was done and sent his First Lieutenant across in a boat to address the British captain. When asked if he would care to surrender, Dacres famously replied: "Our mizzen mast is gone, and our fore and main gone as well. I think, sir, that on the whole one might evince that we have struck our flag." And to this day the British are better at sarcasm than we Americans.
Dacres was welcomed aboard Constitution with all civility. Hull refused Dacres' sword as well. He would say later that he was particularly glad of it when the news came to him that Dacres had allowed 12 impressed American sailors to wait out the battle in Guerrier's hold, rather than have to fight against their countrymen. Though Hull had hoped to tow Guerrier to Boston as prize, the damage to her was to great. When it was clear that she would sink, Hull had all her stores and people removed to Constitution and then set her aflame.
Though a few later encounters - particularly the battle between USS Chesapeake and HMS Shannon - would not go so well for the Americans, this first decisive victory renewed the American hope for a swift and successful end to the war. It also began, even at this early stage, the British shift from a focus on war at sea - where the Royal Navy was flabbergasted at being regularly defeated - to a war on land. Unfortunately, despite the burning of Washington D.C. which remains the flagship victory of Britain and her colonies in the War of 1812, that didn't turn out so well either.
But the Battle of New Orleans is another discussion for another time. For today, Huzzah! Old Ironsides, her crew and Captain Isaac Hull.
Header: USS Constitution vs HMS Guerriere by Michel Felice Corne via Wikipedia
Wednesday, August 29, 2012
Tools of the Trade: In A Fog
Fog can be one of the most deadly atmospheric developments that a ship can meet. This is particularly true along coastlines, which - it should come as no surprise - is where the condition tends to be found. Felix Riesenberg's late 19th century advise that speed in fog should be moderate still applies today. Even with GPS and other high-tech navigational tools, there is always the potential for things to go horribly wrong.
That is no doubt why our seafaring ancestors had fairly stringent rules for how to navigate in fog. As Peter H. Spectre notes in his A Mariner's Miscellany, one should always remember four simple things when caught in a fog on the water: keep your eyes open, keep your ears open, keep your dead-reckoning plot and keep your head.
The conditions that lead to fog are almost standard. Regardless of where one is on the globe, these weather signs will apply. The largest issue is the contact of warm with cold. Warm air flowing over a cold surface, such as water or land, will cause fog. This is particularly true if humidity is high. Likewise, cold air coming into contact with warm land or warm rain will usually lead to fog. How dense the fog is depends on the temperature differential for the most part and to some degree a lack of wind as well.
Sailors identified certain particularly difficult fog conditions by name. The condition known as foggy breath arises when one can see their breath in warm weather, as if the air were in fact cold. Seamen agree that when this situation, which is usually a result of high humidity, occurs, fog will accumulate soon.
Advection fog is the thick, pea-soup fog commonly found off shore. This is caused by warm, humid air blowing over cold water. Radiation fog, on the other hand, is the type that clings to the ground or the water. Familiar to anyone who has spent time in bogs, bayous or swamps, this fog is caused by land that has been warmed during the day cooling down and cooling the air just above it as well. The air farther up remains warm, causing the type of fog which has been both the friend and foe of inland smugglers but is not as troublesome for the seagoing freebooter.
Knowing the conditions that can cause fog, feeling them in the air before the actual situations arises, can go a long way to keeping a ship safe at sea. Even in the thickest of fogs. Fore warned, as they say, if fore armed.
Header: Homeward Bound After the Storm by Monica Vanzant. This lovely piece is available for purchase at Fine Art America
That is no doubt why our seafaring ancestors had fairly stringent rules for how to navigate in fog. As Peter H. Spectre notes in his A Mariner's Miscellany, one should always remember four simple things when caught in a fog on the water: keep your eyes open, keep your ears open, keep your dead-reckoning plot and keep your head.
The conditions that lead to fog are almost standard. Regardless of where one is on the globe, these weather signs will apply. The largest issue is the contact of warm with cold. Warm air flowing over a cold surface, such as water or land, will cause fog. This is particularly true if humidity is high. Likewise, cold air coming into contact with warm land or warm rain will usually lead to fog. How dense the fog is depends on the temperature differential for the most part and to some degree a lack of wind as well.
Sailors identified certain particularly difficult fog conditions by name. The condition known as foggy breath arises when one can see their breath in warm weather, as if the air were in fact cold. Seamen agree that when this situation, which is usually a result of high humidity, occurs, fog will accumulate soon.
Advection fog is the thick, pea-soup fog commonly found off shore. This is caused by warm, humid air blowing over cold water. Radiation fog, on the other hand, is the type that clings to the ground or the water. Familiar to anyone who has spent time in bogs, bayous or swamps, this fog is caused by land that has been warmed during the day cooling down and cooling the air just above it as well. The air farther up remains warm, causing the type of fog which has been both the friend and foe of inland smugglers but is not as troublesome for the seagoing freebooter.
Knowing the conditions that can cause fog, feeling them in the air before the actual situations arises, can go a long way to keeping a ship safe at sea. Even in the thickest of fogs. Fore warned, as they say, if fore armed.
Header: Homeward Bound After the Storm by Monica Vanzant. This lovely piece is available for purchase at Fine Art America
Monday, August 27, 2012
Literature: Of Sailors Old and New
Alexis de Tocqueville, who was born in Paris in 1805, was a brilliant observer of his fellow human beings. He traveled extensively in the U.S. between the War of 1812 and the American Civil War and left his thoughts to posterity in his seminal work Democracy in America. At a time when almost any travel had something to do with getting on a ship and being in close proximity with sailors, Monsieur de T had some thoughts about that, too:
The European sailor navigates with prudence; he only sets sail when the weather is favorable; if an unfortunate accident befalls him, he puts into port; at night he furls a portion of his canvas; and when the whitening billows intimate the vicinity of land, he checks his way and takes an observation of the sun.
But the American neglects these precautions and braves these dangers. He weighs anchor in the midst of tempestuous gales; by night and day he spreads his sheets to the winds; he repairs as he goes along such damage as his vessel may have sustained from the storm; and when at last approaches the term of his voyage, he darts onward to the shore as if he already descried a port. The Americans are often shipwrecked, but no trader crosses the sea so rapidly. And as they perform the same distance in a shorter time, they can perform it at a cheaper rate.
As Benjamin Franklin once noted, the Americans - as de Tocqueville would call us - had become an entirely different race of people. And that went for sailors, too.
Header: Alexis de Tocqueville by Theodore Chasseriau c 1850, just six years prior to his death, via Wikipedia
The European sailor navigates with prudence; he only sets sail when the weather is favorable; if an unfortunate accident befalls him, he puts into port; at night he furls a portion of his canvas; and when the whitening billows intimate the vicinity of land, he checks his way and takes an observation of the sun.
But the American neglects these precautions and braves these dangers. He weighs anchor in the midst of tempestuous gales; by night and day he spreads his sheets to the winds; he repairs as he goes along such damage as his vessel may have sustained from the storm; and when at last approaches the term of his voyage, he darts onward to the shore as if he already descried a port. The Americans are often shipwrecked, but no trader crosses the sea so rapidly. And as they perform the same distance in a shorter time, they can perform it at a cheaper rate.
As Benjamin Franklin once noted, the Americans - as de Tocqueville would call us - had become an entirely different race of people. And that went for sailors, too.
Header: Alexis de Tocqueville by Theodore Chasseriau c 1850, just six years prior to his death, via Wikipedia
Sunday, August 26, 2012
Seafaring Sunday: An End of Long Strife
August
26, 1865: The Civil War ends with the U.S. Navy at its highest numbers to
the day: 600 ships and 58,500 sailors.
Header: Battle
of Mobile Bay
by Xanthus R.
Smith c 1890 via Wikimedia
Saturday, August 25, 2012
Sailor Mouth Saturday: Pick/Pike
I was inspired to pick today’s
words by U.S. Navy pikes. Trust me, that insane sentence will make sense by the
end of this post.
In sailor-speak, pick means the
usual things it does on land. Even at sea you can pick your nose and you can
pick your friends but I’m not going to finish that old canard. Canard, as an
aside, means duck in French; while ducks have beaks and friends, they have no
noses. It is only at sea, however, that a ship can pick up the wind. This is a
term for a sailing ship going from one trade or other reliable wind to another
while avoiding calms as much as possible. This was a favorite tactic of clipper
ships in their heyday as they ran from New York
to San Francisco then on to China and around to New York again.
Pickets
are pointed staffs thrust into the ground to demark military terrain, or even
just tie a horse to. Pickets may also be markers for pointing a mortar towards
its target, even if same is not visible from the weapon. Piquet is a group put
on watch at a distance from the main body of military to sound the first alarm
in case of approach by the enemy.
A
picard was a type of barge or boat once used for shipping materials and
livestock on the Severn river in England. The word’s origin may or
may not be related to the French word for a native of Picardy.
A picaroon was a small vessel used for piracy in the New World whose name
probably originated with the Old World term
for petty theft. Piccary was petty thievery on the High Seas and in England
pickerie was the theft of small items – a loaf of bread or an apple – that was
usually considered the act of women and/or children. The long-standing sentence
for pickerie was the far-worse-than-it-sounds punishment of ducking or
swimming. Usually carried out in either very cold and/or filthy bodies of
water, this form of torture could lead to death outright or infection that
essentially amounted to a death sentence.
Pickling
for sea voyages was done not only to food but also to wood. Pickling of timber
in order to make it more durable was often accomplished with Sir William
Burnett’s fluid, a solution of chloride and zinc. Because of this method,
pickling was sometimes called Burnettizing.
A
picul (or, more properly, pekul) was a commercial weight in China
equivalent to approximately 130 pounds. Pictarnie is a Scottish word for the
seagoing bird known as a tern.
A
pike-turn or a turn-pike is what was known to the French as a chevaux de frise. This was the habit of
topping military pikes with iron and standing them upright through beams, much
like a fence, to discourage the enemy. In fact, the French term – which
literally translates curly hair – is used to this day to denote a certain type
of wrought iron fencing.
Finally,
a pike is best described by Admiral Smyth:
A long, slender, round
staff, armed at the end with iron (as in a boarding-pike). Formerly in general
use but which gave way to the bayonet.
And
so here is the picture, from the U.S Navy’s Twitter feed, that got me thinking
about pikes while picking today’s words. I told you it would all make sense.
Eventually.
Header: Engraving of a
ducking or water ordeal from the late Medieval period via The Medievalist
Friday, August 24, 2012
Booty: Truly Amazing
As the Brethren are well aware, I am currently spending a good bit of my time kicking cancer's ugly ass in true piratical fashion. That means that the schedule aboard the good ship Triple P will be adjusting slightly for my early morning radiation treatments. We started yesterday, radiation and I, and should finish up the first or second week in October. Until then, posting may be spotty but I'll do my best and I may occasionally pull an old favorite out of the archives.
For today, though, a truly amazing reminder of just how magnificent - and powerful - the lakes, seas and oceans of our blue planet can be. Watch waterspouts form over Lake Michigan in this video from CNN.
Happy Friday; I'll be back tomorrow with Sailor Mouth Saturday!
Header: One More Step Mr. Hands, illustration by N.C. Wyeth from Treasure Island via Wikimedia
For today, though, a truly amazing reminder of just how magnificent - and powerful - the lakes, seas and oceans of our blue planet can be. Watch waterspouts form over Lake Michigan in this video from CNN.
Happy Friday; I'll be back tomorrow with Sailor Mouth Saturday!
Header: One More Step Mr. Hands, illustration by N.C. Wyeth from Treasure Island via Wikimedia
Wednesday, August 22, 2012
History: Harsh Medicine
The work of a surgeon aboard ship in the Great Age of Sail
was no picnic. Men were more often ill than injured; statistics kept by the
Royal Navy on their Jamaica
station from the late 18th century until the end of the War of 1812
bare this out. More men died of yellow fever than of any other cause. In war or
peace, men still managed to contract illnesses.
Until the mid-19th century, the essential
approach to such issues was one of “imbalance.” The humors, as originally
specified by Galen in the first century CE, had to be in perfect order for the
body to be healthy. Thus such treatments as bleeding and purging, incomprehensible
to the modern mind, were commonly applied to draw out the ill-humors and right
the body’s functions.
One of the most wince-worthy treatments of the time was
blistering, which is not as often spoken of as bloodletting but was equally
popular. This application was used to draw heat out of the body and was
therefore applied in the case of fevers, swelling and sepsis. If an area of the
body was red and hot to the touch, then it stood to reason – at least when
applying the theory of humors – that the heat needed to be taken away with a
form of like heat. Enter blistering.
Blistering agents, sometimes referred to as epispastics,
were generally made of a wax or lard base. The key ingredient in almost all
blistering plasters was cantharide beetles dried and then ground to a fine
powder. The beetles, often called Spanish flies, had an irritant in their
exoskeleton to discourage predators which would cause inflammation.
Along with use as a blistering agent, Spanish fly was also
sprinkled on food or in wine as an aphrodisiac. The painful result,
unfortunately, was an irritation of the urethra. Since this would sometimes
lead to prolonged erections both in the male penis and the female clitoris, the
use of Spanish fly has persisted into the modern era. (Don’t try that at home
kids; you can end up needing to be catheterized in order to urinate. Nobody
wants that.)
Mrs.
Child, in her 1830s publication The
Family Nurse, gives a straight forward recipe for a blistering ointment as
well as instructions for application:
The common blistering
plaster is made of fresh mutton tallow, yellow wax, resin of pine, cantharides,
or Spanish flies; equal portions of each. The flies are finely powdered and
added to the other ingredients previously melted together and removed from the
fire. Usually spread on soft leather or kid, somewhat larger than the hand. If
the surface be spread with powdered flies, it is more irritating. If this fails
to draw a blister, Venice
turpentine, powdered mustard and black pepper are sometimes mixed with it.
The
optimal result saw large blisters breaking out on the “cherry red” skin. Mrs.
Child goes on to up the teeth-gritting quotient by advising that, should the
blisters formed by the plaster refuse to pop in a timely manner, they should be
snipped “with sharp scissors” before linen is applied to absorb the desired
discharge. She does mention that one should go light on the cantharides in
plasters made for children.
The
generally soft-hearted and homeopathic-leaning Mrs. Child also gives a number
of ways to relieve the inevitable pain brought on by this treatment. These
include cabbage or plantain leaves soaked in milk and used as a “soothing
dressing.” It is doubtful that any navy surgeon would have troubled himself
with such coddling of a patient; one shudders to think of the application of a
blistering aboard a pirate vessel.
The
distasteful regimen of blistering fell out of favor by the late 19th
century, but a far less harmful remnant of the treatment remained. It is no
doubt that most of our great-grandmothers applied a “mustard plaster” to their sick
children. This smelly but harmless treatment was meant to clear up clogged
nasal passages. A form of such home-brewed medicine remains today in the
familiar application we know as Vicks Vapo Rub.
Header: Subtraction by H.
Heath via Wikimedia (it will take more than a blistering plaster to help those sailors…)
Tuesday, August 21, 2012
Ships: Small but Mighty
On August 21st in the year of our Lord 1607, a
group of Englishmen began construction on the first vessel built by Europeans
in the New World. She would make her maiden
voyage on the Kennebec River in what was then Massachusetts
Territory and is now the sovereign
state of Maine.
Her builders would name her Virginia,
after Elizabeth I, and her type would be recorded as a pinnace. Exactly what sort
of pinnace, for there were several over the course of history, is open to
debate. Two possibilities stand out in particular, so let us explore them both.
The first type of pinnace built by Europeans would probably
be more recognizable to modern historians as a small galleon. This sturdy,
useful vessel was originally built by the Dutch, who called her a pinas. These ships were used mostly for
the merchant round from the British Isles, around the Iberian Peninsula into
the Mediterranean and back. You can see a
modern replica here.
According to the Chatham Dockyard website, the first pinnace
of the galleon class built in England
was named Sunne and launched in 1586.
Shipwrecked evidence leads to the conclusion that the British may have been the
first country to use the galleon-built pinnace as a warship. An English
pinnace, probably from the early 17th century and carrying 12 matching
cannon, was found in 2009.
This type of ship-rigged, three masted vessel was also
popular with the buccaneers of the Caribbean
during the age of Laurens de Graff and Henry Morgan. Its shallow draft and
light construction – the ships were often made of pine, which may be the origin
of their name – made them ideal from men who were more interested in plundering
on land than sailing on wave.
Another type of pinnace was being built in the same era, and
its small frame and ease of design make it a more likely candidate as a
descendant of Virginia. These were a sturdy ship that
must more properly be called a boat and resembled the illustration at the
header. Rowed with eight oars or propelled by sails on one or sometimes two
masts, this pinnace would become a staple among large ship’s boats in the Great
Age of Sail.
These smaller pinnaces were most often used as a tender by
larger ships. They were utilized for provisioning, as mail packets, to run men
or messages between ships at sea and to carry parties of men ashore when
necessary. They were extremely popular with smugglers in Europe
and their construction may in part have influenced the pirogue, built in the
American south and used for much the same purpose.
This second type of pinnace, a smaller, lighter, less cumbersome
invention, was probably what the Puritans at the mouth of the Kennebec River
put together in 1607. It was only a matter of time, however, until larger ships
were turned out from dockyards along the Atlantic coast. Still, the small but
mighty pinnace continued and is still in use today.
Header: An American
Pinnace in Virginia
1584 by Seth Eastman c 1850 via Wikipedia
Monday, August 20, 2012
Sea Monsters: Sea Serpent of Portland
Arrived here, schooner
Maxamilla, Freeman Smith, master, from Lubeck, with 44 Irish passengers, for New York. Captain S. states that on Thursday
about 40 miles S.E. of Monhegin [Island], the weather moderate, he discovered
as he judged, about two miles ahead, something he took to be a small boat under
sail; but finding it soon disappeared, the conclusion was that the object was
the area’s noted sea serpent. In a few moments anticipation was realized: as
the monster was discovered about a quarter of a mile to the leeward with his
head about 15 feet out of the water, and his tail at the same time about 10
feet out, his breast, or body, near the water, was encircled with a clear white
stripe, the diameter to appearance about 6 feet. In this position the monster
remained two minutes, as if attentively viewing the vessel; and he then began
thrashing the water, with his head alternately upon either side, with the most
fury.
~ from a brief article in the Portland,
Maine Eastern Argus dated August 21, 1818
Header: Moonrise on
the Coast by John W. Casilear via American Gallery
Sunday, August 19, 2012
Seafaring Sunday: The Horrors of War
August 19, 1702: A six day engagement between a
British squadron under Vice Admiral John Benbow and a French squadron
under Admiral Jean du Casse began off the coast of Santa Marta, Grand Colombia. Benbow
vigorously attacked the French squadron, but the refusal of most of his
captains to support the action allowed du Casse to escape. Two of the
captains, Richard Kirby of HMS Defiance
and Cooper Wade of HMS Greenwich
were convicted of cowardice and shot.
Header: The Horrors of
War by Caroline Tank via American Gallery
Saturday, August 18, 2012
Sailor Mouth Saturday: Cheat
As the Brethren are well aware, sailors are a superstitious
lot. Today’s word plays in to that mind set. And it also points up where and
when a sailor is not afraid to let superstition go by the board to save his
skin, or for an extra few minutes of blessed sleep.
The practice known at sea as cheating the Devil has
everything to do with superstition. Bringing the Lord, or for that matter the
Arch Fiend, into one’s speech was a sure way to court disaster aboard ship. This
lead to what Admiral Smyth refers to as the “softening of very profane phrases”
in The Sailor’s Word Book. Thus
“God’s death” might come out as ‘od’s depth. Other epithets familiar to the
seamen that would otherwise feature the word God might include ‘od’s blood, ‘od
rot it, or for ‘od’s sake.
On the other hand, calling up the Devil would never do
either, except as an absolute last resort. In such cases, a sailor might offer
his hair to the Devil, throwing a lock into the water or up into the wind to
please Old Scratch in desperate times. Help in a pinch is help, after all; the
consequences can be dealt with later. All things being equal, however, sailors
would rather not court Satan. Thus phrases like by gosh, be darned and dang you
probably had a seagoing origin. More colorful terms such as deuce take you and
see you blown first might also be overheard. Better safe than sorry after all.
The habit known as cheating, or flogging, the glass comes
from a time when clocks were not a feature on a ship’s deck. The timing of
bells and watches was kept by means of a half-hour glass which was usually hung
near the binnacle. General understanding
among seamen had it that the sand would run through the glass more quickly if
exposed to vibration. A man might “cheat the glass” by jarring it surreptitiously.
As Admiral Smyth aptly puts it:
… hence some weary
soul towards the end of his watch was said to flog the glass.
Given that the average Jack got no more than four hours at a
stretch of free time at sea, one can imagine a tired soul being desperate to
hurry time along.
Happy Saturday, Brethren; watch your language – and the
glass – out there.
Header: Sunset by
Mykola Yaroshenko via Old Paint
Friday, August 17, 2012
Booty: "Making to You Intimidation"
I don't have a whole lot of time this morning so I am going to let the letter above, from Jamal's Pirate Action Group, speak for itself. Click to enlarge and see what happens when Somali pirates get their business together.
My thanks to the First Mate and the good folks over at Bro Bible for this little piece of "modern history."
My thanks to the First Mate and the good folks over at Bro Bible for this little piece of "modern history."
Thursday, August 16, 2012
Women at Sea: Mademoiselle de la Rocque
On the face of it, the story of Marguerite de la Rocque
reads as a simple one. Good girl from up-and-coming family gets knocked up and
kicked out of the house. In Marguerite’s case, the situation and consequences
of her scandal were so unusual as to be extreme.
In what year and exactly where Marguerite was born remains
somewhat of a mystery. We know that her influential kinsman, Jean-Francois de
la Rocque de Roberval, was born around 1500 in the ancient city of Carcassonne, located in southern France. We also
know that Marguerite held lands in Languedoc,
also in southern France,
in her own name by 1536. She also jointly owned land in Pontpoint with
Roberval. Roberval would have a significant effect on Marguerite’s life but
their exact relationship continues as pure speculation. Certain historians call
them brother and sister or half-siblings while others say they were cousins.
Either way, Marguerite seems to have been under the protection of Roberval by
the time she reached maturity.
Roberval was a social climber who wormed his way into a
friendship with the young Francois I of France
during a brief military foray into Italy in 1524. Francois took a
shine to young Jean and gifted him the estate of Roberval in northern France. There,
the two buddies spent time hunting and womanizing but Roberval could not keep
up with Francois’ expensive tastes. He borrowed heavily on his estates in the
south and did a brief but unsuccessful stint as a French privateer when those
same estates were threatened with foreclosure.
Desperate, Roberval returned to Francois and proposed that
the king grant him a commission to recolonize New France.
This was the area of Canada
now known as Quebec and Newfoundland. Roberval had help convincing
Francois from a shifty individual named Jacques Cartier. Cartier had been to New France, and he enjoyed flashing the “diamonds and
gold” – which were in fact nothing more expensive than quartz crystal and
pyrite – that he had found there “in great abundance.”
The king agreed and made Roberval Lieutenant General of New France in 1541. At this time, it is reasonable to
assume that Marguerite was somewhere between 20 and 25 years old. And it is
here that the narrative of her life’s story turns from standard to curious
indeed.
For some reason that history fails to mention, Marguerite de
la Rocque signed on for her kinsman’s passage to New
France. Why a young, unmarried woman from a good family and with
land in her own name would do such a thing is a point for discussion. Even if
Roberval was her appointed guardian, one might imagine that a good marriage
would be a better way to look after her than packing her off to an unknown,
inhospitable colony. All the same, that is what Roberval did and Marguerite,
along with her maidservant Damienne, boarded the ship Valentine bound for New France in
April of 1542.
The passage was doubtless grueling, as all travel was at the
time. Three ships held 200 colonists along with Roberval’s men, a few horses
and the ships’ sailors. At some point during the months-long cruise, Marguerite
began an affair with one of her shipmates. Who this man was remains part of the
mystery surrounding her. Speculation makes him everything from a young knight
to a hardened soldier. In her novella about Marguerite published in 1559, the
Queen of Spain, Marguerite of Navarre, made the young man a poor carpenter.
Who he was not withstanding, Roberval found out about the
man’s dalliance with his kinswoman and he did not take it lightly. In true
puritanical fashion (Roberval was secretly a member of the Calvinist church in France, known as Huguenots), the new Lieutenant
General marooned a probably pregnant Marguerite de la Rocque on a barren island
off the coast of Quebec,
along with her maid. In some accounts, the offending lover was set down on the
island with them. In others, he jumped off the departing ship and swam to
Marguerite’s side. Either way the three, or perhaps four, marooners were stuck
on the Isle de Demons – island of Demons which is speculated to be the modern Hospital Island.
What exactly happened during the two and a half years that
Marguerite was literally stranded can’t be said, but she certainly encountered
one hardship after another. Local legend says that the band of three took
shelter in a particular cave. It is known that they had a certain amount of
provisions, including at least one gun, black powder and shot, one or more
knives, a Bible and perhaps bread. In short order they had to turn to hunting
and gathering. Before the birth of her baby, both Damienne the maidservant and
Marguerite’s lover had died.
Marguerite managed to give birth on her own. If she was
indeed pregnant when Roberval marooned her, the blessed event would have
occurred in the spring. It is probably no surprise to anyone that Marguerite’s
final companion, and apparently only child, died within a month of her birth.
Even in the face of so much loss, Marguerite went on. She
wielded the gun with aplomb, even taking down a bear at one point. She was
wrapped in its skin when Basque fishermen from Newfoundland happened by in the fall of 1544.
She climbed into their boat, clutching her tattered Bible, and never looked
back.
Marguerite returned to France,
where legend says she opened a school for girls in Picardy.
No records exist of any legal action brought against Roberval on her behalf. It
seems a certainty that, after failing in New France, he returned to Paris and claimed her
lands as his own. This greedy act may very well have been the motive for his
brutal treatment of Marguerite from the very beginning.
But karma, then as now, is a hard mistress. Leaving a
Huguenot meeting one night in Paris, Roberval and a group of companions were attacked and beaten to
death by a Catholic mob. He was 59 or 60 years old.
The unfortunately little-known story of Marguerite de la
Rocque, the female Robinson Crusoe who knew the isolation of a marooner years
before Alexander Selkirk was even born, remains a titillating fabric whose
frayed edges cry out to be sewn up.
Header: Can You Hear
Me Now by Christina Ramos via American Gallery
Wednesday, August 15, 2012
History: The Crafty Spy
With the celebratory goings on over the bicentennial of the
War of 1812 here in the U.S., I’m feeling the itch to get back to my roots and
talk a little bit about the contributions made by a certain pirate
ancestor. Since the war was initially
about insults at sea and fought on wave to a large degree, it only makes sense
that Renato Beluche would want to get in on the action, so to say.
Beluche, who was at the time of his birth the oldest son of
“Big” Rene and Rose Laporte Beluche, took to the sea at an early age. His father died sometime after Renato’s
eighth birthday leaving a pregnant wife and a mound of debts. The young man went where he could get work,
down to the docks, and by the age of 16 owned and captained his own
vessel. By the time the U.S. declared war on Great Britain in June of 1812,
Beluche was a seasoned privateer and a lieutenant in Bolivar’s Cartagenan navy.
Probably close to half of the ships that cruised under an
American flag during the war were privately owned and holding a letter of
marque from the U.S.
government. According to Dr. Jane Lucas
de Grummond, who published the definitive biography on Renato Beluche in 1983,
six of those commissions were issued out of New Orleans in August of 1812. One of these went to a schooner named Spy.
Spy was nominally owned by a New Orleans merchant
named Stephen Debon, according to the commission. Debon turned command, and the letter of
marque, over to Beluche. This is perhaps
a less curious turn of events than it may appear. Throughout his career, Renato Beluche owned
one or more privateers, sometimes captaining them himself and sometimes turning
command over to others among the loose-knit band of pirates and privateers who
called Barataria their home port. Ships
were then and still are vulnerable things and, in a pinch, it was always better
to sail for someone else than not to sail at all.
Beluche had recently lost his own brig, L’Intrepide, along with a prize to a hurricane in the Gulf of Mexico.
Doubtless Debon’s offer of a ship and a commission was too good to
refuse. Therein, however, may lay the
conundrum of the business relationship between Monsieur Debon and Captain
Beluche.
In November of 1812, Stephen Debon brought suit against
Renato Beluche in a New Orleans
court. The complaint claimed that Debon,
as owner of Spy, had been cheated out
of his share of prize money by Beluche.
This had occurred, said the complaint, because Beluche had taken more
than one prize into Barataria rather than bringing them into New
Orleans as specifically outlined in Spy’s U.S.
letter of marque.
On the face of it, Debon appears to be in the right. In
order to lawfully libel a prize, the captain of the privateer must bring said
prize into the port from which he (or she if you will) received his
commission. Unfortunately for Monsieur
Debon, he was dealing with a man who had learned his craft well and whose close
friends and associates, the Laffite brothers, had connections in court.
Beluche engaged one of those connections, former New Orleans
District Attorney John Randolph Grymes, who went to work rebutting Debon’s
complaint immediately. Grymes argued
that of course Beluche had taken prizes into Barataria, no one was disputing
that. Those prizes were Spanish
merchants, however, taken under Beluche’s commission from Cartagena.
Should Spy capture a British
vessel under the auspices of the U.S.
letter of marque, he would bring it to New
Orleans for legal libel and Debon would promptly be
paid his share.
Another Laffite sympathizer, Judge Dominique Hall, saw
things the way Grymes outlined them. He
dismissed Debon’s complaint and, probably in the same pen-stroke, authorized
the libel of a British merchant, Jane,
recently brought into New Orleans
as prize by none other than Beluche aboard Spy. Perhaps his share of her cargo of mahogany
and logwood, which the Louisiana Gazette
estimated at “35 to 40$ per ton”, was enough to make Debon realize he needn’t
trouble himself further.
The legal wrangling, which only went on until February 1,
1813 when Judge Hall announced his decision, is an excellent example of the
crafty use of letters of marque by the men who sailed out of Barataria. As William C. Davis notes in The Pirates Laffite, international law forbade
the holding of more than one country’s letter of marque at any given time. With this in mind, Debon’s argument was
legally valid.
But, as my dear Uncle Renato clearly knew better than
Monsieur Debon, nothing gets shit done like having powerful friends who have
friends in high places.
Monday, August 13, 2012
Tools of the Trade: "That Disgust of Existence"
We’ve discussed seasickness, and its causes and cures,
before here at Triple P. As it turns
out, almost all animals can succumb to seasickness and humans are not often
spared. That includes, it seems,
literary lions from days gone by. Here
is a little insight into the miseries suffered by none other than Harriet
Beecher Stowe of Uncle Tom’s Cabin
fame:
That disgust of
existence, which, in half an hour of sailing, begins to come upon you; that
strange, mysterious ineffable sensation which steals slowly and inexplicably
upon you; which makes every heaving billow, every white-capped wave, the ship,
the people, the sight, taste, sound and smell of everything a matter of
inexpressible loathing!
An excellent summation, no doubt. The great Charles Dickens, however, chose to
see the bright side, if you will:
I lay there, all the
day long, quite coolly and contentedly; with no sense of weariness, with no
desire to get up, or to get better, or take the air; with no curiosity, or care,
or regret of any sort or degree, saving that I think I can remember, in the
universal indifference, having a kind of lazy joy – of fiendish delight, if
anything so lethargic can be dignified with the title – in the fact of my wife
being too ill to talk to me.
That’s one way to get the old ball and chain to shut up, no
matter how extreme. Ernest Shackleton
wrote of some of his comrades in Antarctic exploration being “appallingly
seasick.” In particular, the ponies he
had brought along on the expedition suffered interminably in high seas. Creatures of the equine persuasion cannot
vomit, so their misery was doubled by a constant nausea that had no release.
Perhaps Hippocrates put it most succinctly when he quipped
“Sailing on the sea proves that motion disturbs the body.” One wonders if it got his wife to clam up for
a while as well.
Header: Sunrise on the Bay
of Fundi by William
Bradford
Sunday, August 12, 2012
Seafaring Sunday: Daring Hull
August 12, 1812: America’s flagship, USS Constitution, captured and destroyed the
British brig Adeona.
This a mere week before her captain, Isaac Hull, would become famous in the U.S. for his
ship’s decisive action against HMS Guerrier. Find out more about Hull at the Naval History & Heritage Command.
Header: Contemporary
portrait of Captain Isaac Hull from NH&HC
Saturday, August 11, 2012
Sailor Mouth Saturday: Service
Two weevils crept from
the crumbs. “You see those weevils,
Stephen?” said Jack solemnly.
“I do.”
“Which would you
choose?”
“There is not a scrap
of difference. Arcades ambo. They are the same species of
curculio, and there is nothing to choose between them.”
“But suppose you had
to choose?”
“Then I should choose
the right-hand weevil; it has a perceptible advantage in both length and
breadth.”
“There I have you,”
cried Jack. “You are bit – you are
completely dished. Don’t you know that
in the Navy you must choose the lesser of two weevils? Oh ha, ha, ha, ha!”
~ from The Fortunes of
War by Patrick O’Brian
What one should do in the Navy was always uppermost in
Triple P’s favorite fictional captain’s mind.
Jack Aubrey was bred to the service, knowing very little of life away
from his familiar wooden world upon wave.
And service, in the form of word and action, would have been equally
dear; it was and still is to men and women like Captain Aubrey.
Service is, as Admiral Smyth notes, the “general term” for
the profession of military men and women.
But the word had other meanings aboard ship in the Great Age of Sail
that may seem unusual, perhaps even surprising, to the modern mind.
To see service was a well-used term at the time for being
involved in fighting action. The risks
of same, of course, were and still are part of the general term.
A serving board was a flat piece of wood with a handle,
vaguely resembling a pizza board, which was used for passing items from one man
to another while working in the rigging.
The handle was usually attached to a so called served rope, which kept
the board or other tools from toppling to the deck. This rope, made of old yarns, was sometimes
simply referred to as a service. The
making of such a rope, and others besides, was accomplished in part with a
serving mallet. This had a groove on one
side and was used to wrap the yarns tightly to form a rope.
Serving out slops is the ancient phrase for handing out
clothing from the stores to men aboard ship.
This is not the same as the auctioning of personal effects that
sometimes occurred after the death of a mate at sea. The phrase became a euphemism for flogging or
other punishments on both sides of the Atlantic
by the middle of the 18th century.
Gun crews were said to serve their gun. Originally this meant supplying each
individual cannon with shot, powder and light but eventually the phrase took on
the meaning of the crew working together to see that their gun was fired fast,
clean and true.
Aboard ship, too, men, machines and stores were referred to
as serviceable. A man was serviceable if
he was able, stores serviceable if fit for use, and those aforementioned guns
serviceable if they could be used without fear of misfire or explosion.
And so then as now – keeping in mind that military service
has been voluntary in most places throughout most of history – those who choose
to serve deserve our thanks, respect and admiration. Triple P salutes you all; you are the true
heroes in our world.
Finally, just in case you were wondering, Dean King kindly
enlightens as to the meaning of the Latin phrase Arcades ambo in his A Sea of Words:
Two people of the same
tastes, professions or character, often used derogatorily. The Latin means literally “both Arcadians,”
i.e., two pastoral poets or musicians.
Friday, August 10, 2012
Booty: Come Hell or High Water
So it looks like the good folks at Diageo, the company that makes and distributes Captain Morgan's Rum, are going to make the odd jumble of artifacts found over a year ago in Panama's Chagres River the remains of Henry Morgan's fleet. And that, as this oh so well researched article from the Huffington Post lets us know, is just about that.
I've gnashed my teeth over this before so I won't trouble the Brethren with the many, many reasons why we are rushing to judgement by naming the artifacts as Morgan's. I have yet to see an article that mentions carbon or any other reliable form of dating of these items. As an old archaeologist that grinds my bones but, basically, what we have here is corporate sponsored history. And those cannon and stuff are Morgan's, come hell or high water.
Click over to the article, which is basically just a mish-mash of quotes from other equally reliable news sources (Fox News and Popular Mechanics figure in the mix), if you are so inclined. The only thing I can personally vouch for there are the pictures; those, it must be said, are quite lovely.
Header: The Ruyter map of the West Indies c 1747 via Wikimedia
I've gnashed my teeth over this before so I won't trouble the Brethren with the many, many reasons why we are rushing to judgement by naming the artifacts as Morgan's. I have yet to see an article that mentions carbon or any other reliable form of dating of these items. As an old archaeologist that grinds my bones but, basically, what we have here is corporate sponsored history. And those cannon and stuff are Morgan's, come hell or high water.
Click over to the article, which is basically just a mish-mash of quotes from other equally reliable news sources (Fox News and Popular Mechanics figure in the mix), if you are so inclined. The only thing I can personally vouch for there are the pictures; those, it must be said, are quite lovely.
Header: The Ruyter map of the West Indies c 1747 via Wikimedia
Tuesday, August 7, 2012
People: The Devout Buccaneer
Today’s pirate is of the boucanier
variety. Known only by his surname, as
Captain Daniel, the historians who have written about him agree that he was
from France. His exploits seem to have occurred in the
French islands of the Caribbean and it is
possible, from one specific connection, to speculate that he may have dealt in
slaves. However, only one story of
Captain Daniel has come down to us in tact.
Fortunately, it’s a good one.
In Philip Gosse’s The Pirate’sWho’s Who, Gosse quotes the now famous Pere Labat who was the Procurator
General of the Antilles by 1696. This priest, who lived many years in the Caribbean, owned a large sugar plantation and devised new
ways of harvesting and processing the cane.
He kept a large number of slaves, the bulk of whom he is said to have
treated with uniform brutality (for more on the life of a slave on Caribbean sugar plantations, see this excellent post by
my friend Leah Marie Brown). With that, or perhaps
because of it, he was particularly fond of the buccaneers who sailed in and out
of his island’s ports, and wrote of them in his book A New Voyage to the Islands
of America, published in 1722.
Gosse tells us that Daniel put in
to “one of the Saintes” in the Caribbean in
search of “wine, brandy and fowls.”
Though the locals were at first skittish about the pirates rummaging around
their town for supplies, Daniel was adamant that he had no intention of doing
violence upon them. Apparently to show
his good will, he invited the town’s elite to board his ship and be his guests. One of those herded onto the pirate vessel
was the local priest.
While the provisions were being
loaded aboard ship, Daniel showed his guests around. At some point, apparently focusing his attention
on the terrified priest, he asked that the man say Mass for his guests and his
crew. A request “which the poor priest
dared not refuse.” Going on to quote
from Harling, who is probably paraphrasing Labat, Gosse gives us a clear
picture of what happened next:
So the necessary sacred vessels were sent for and an altar
improvised on the deck for the service, which they chanted to the best of their
ability. As at Martinique,
the Mass was begun with a discharge of artillery, and after the Exaudiat and
prayer for the King, was closed by a loud “Vive le Roi” from the throats of the
buccaneers. A single incident, however,
somewhat disturbed the devotions. One of
the buccaneers, remaining in an indecent attitude during the Elevation, was
rebuked by the captain and instead of heeding the correction, replied with an
impertinence and a fearful oath. Quick
as a flash Daniel whipped our his pistol and shot the buccaneer through the head,
adjuring God that he would do as much to the first who failed in his respect to
the Holy Sacrifice. The shot was fired
close by the priest who, as we can readily imagine, was considerable agitated. “Do
not be troubled, my father,” said Daniel; “he was a rascal lacking in his duty
and I have punished him to teach him better.”
Presumably, Mass went on and
afterward the offender’s body was tossed into the sea. The guests, who surely had a story to tell for
years to come, were thanked and excused.
The priest was paid for his service, Gosse says, in “some goods out of
[the pirates’] stores and the present of a negro slave.”
This last point makes me wonder
about the Labat connection. The
Procurator General’s ill treatment of his own slaves meant he would have needed
a steady supply of new ones coming in.
Did men like Daniel help the priest turned planter out with human chattel
at lower prices than the market had set?
I have no proof of such dealings with buccaneers, but it would explain
Labat’s soft spot for the violent freebooters who roamed the Caribbean
when he was there.
Header: Looting Buccaneers by Howard Pyle via Wikipedia
Monday, August 6, 2012
Literature: "Cans of Grog"
When sailing orders do arrive
Bold Jack he takes his leave
My dear sweetest Pol he cries
I pray now do not grieve.
Thy Jack will take his daily can
Of grog and drink to thee
In hopes that thou will n'er forget
Thy sailor who's at sea.
But should thou false or fickle prove
To Jack who loves thee dear
No more upon my native shore
Can I with joy appear.
But restless as the briny main
Must heartless heave the log
Shall trim the sails and try to drown
My sorrow in cans of grog.
~ Cans of Grog; a sea chanty dating back to the late 18th or early 19th century
Header: Foam Study by my dear friend Munin
Bold Jack he takes his leave
My dear sweetest Pol he cries
I pray now do not grieve.
Thy Jack will take his daily can
Of grog and drink to thee
In hopes that thou will n'er forget
Thy sailor who's at sea.
But should thou false or fickle prove
To Jack who loves thee dear
No more upon my native shore
Can I with joy appear.
But restless as the briny main
Must heartless heave the log
Shall trim the sails and try to drown
My sorrow in cans of grog.
~ Cans of Grog; a sea chanty dating back to the late 18th or early 19th century
Header: Foam Study by my dear friend Munin
Sunday, August 5, 2012
Seafaring Sunday: "Damn the Torpedoes!"
August 5, 1864: Union Navy Rear Admiral David Farragut wins the
Battle of Mobile Bay, closing down the last Confederate port on the Gulf Coast. He famously tied himself into the rigging of
his ship during the action to guide his fleet through Confederate torpedoes and
uttered the memorable line “Damn the torpedoes!
Full speed (or go) ahead!”
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)